Jun 13, 2015 0
Feb 10, 2015 0
Some words from me, across the Internet…
A look at the Tories’ Facebook bill, and why it’s so weird, over on Holmes Report
I also did a Q&A with the PerformanceIn team, ahead of judging the Performance Marketing Awards 2015 – as well as wrote the content marketing segments for the PerformanceIn Performance Marketing Guide for 2015
Jan 19, 2015 0
Amusingly, I still have two drafts that I started in late 2013. My review of Sheryl Sanberg’s Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead, is one of them.
I actually read the book and wrote the review for Marketing, and it formed part of their recommended books feature for Christmas. However, seeing as I still stand by the whole idea of getting stuck in (and the benefit of saying ‘yes’ more), I thought I’d dig out my review and post it here as well.
You could be forgiven for having heard of Lean In, but not actually knowing what the book is about. If Sheryl Sandberg weren’t chief operating officer of Facebook, would there have been such a furore? Possibly not.
There’s a lot of confusion about what “leaning in” actually is, and why it’s better or no different from other approaches for getting more women to the top.
As I understand it, “leaning in” simply means getting more involved. Obviously there’s rather more to it besides, but that seems to be the gist. While I recognise that taking advice on how to “break through glass ceilings” may be hard to hear from a Harvard graduate worth $400m, I do feel that the message of Sandberg’s book has suffered because of her somewhat controversial profile.
The idea of “leaning in” stands up to a point. I support the “fake it till you feel it” approach, plus the encouragement to get involved – but at the same time, I also subscribe to BBH legend Cindy Gallop’s approach. There are similarities in their views, largely centring on the need to put yourself forward and fight inner fear of failing, but Gallop suggests that we can redesign working models rather than align with them.
Reading between the lines, Lean In seems to suggest that you can play by the rules of the boys’ club to get to a senior level and then effect change from within. Is this the wrong thing to do? I don’t know. But do we even need to decide? The whole “you have to be in it to win it” mentality resonates with me, and that seems to be the most important thing.
Dec 13, 2013 0
Real-time, or ‘reactive’ marketing is a dangerous game; one that’s guilty of spurring so many brands into creating content for content’s sake.
While the notion of news-jacking to respond to big media stories and events has existed in a PR context for years, it’s the sheer speed of social media that’s made everyone go a little crazy for ‘getting something out’ before the moment’s gone.
All you have to do is type ‘brands royal baby’ into Google to see the backlash to this. Royallydesperate.tumblr.com is my personal favourite.
There’s also now this misconception that real-time marketing is only limited to creating images in an instant – whereas in fact it’s much more than that.
TMW has been doing this type of social design for years on Lynx. It built an entirely new process around putting a designer and a copywriter together to quickly produce social posts that respond to cultural events, and that in turn has led to the creation of a whole new team of community managers.
But real-time also relates to everything else that goes on around this; building trust between client and agency (and then agency to agency) so that decisions can be made quickly, proper documentation of social guidelines and policies, and using the proper tools to monitor what’s really being said online.
It’s all very well trying to be witty in response to a blackout at the Super Bowl, but without these four things in place, you risk doing things for the sake of it – and seriously missing the mark.
Producing social content is great, but it’s got to be relevant – and at the end of the day, even if you nail it, it’s only one part of the picture.